When I look at you - Miley Cyrus

Friday 4th June

Today we went to watch the play EXTRAS at the Biblioteca Nacional near my crib. Unfortunately for us we went with form II. SHAME ON THEM. they won my "THE LOOK". anyway. Some ideas.

1) The change of characters by the two actors i think was great. The first time i didn't understand what happened but i then catch the idea in no time. Actually i liked it, i think it was great like for example when the other actor hold the others hat. It directly appeals for the audience imagination and attention. Bad thing: sometimes the characters got mixed up. So it was an argentinean talking like a gringa or a guy talking like a girl. But overall i liked it.

2) SCREEN! ..(chupala). marks off for this play. The video in the middle could've been acted or just ...mentioned. no need for the video. (great video btw..)

3) Skenary and Crops. ... the box with wheels wasn't necessary,... nose. didn't like it.

4)The part when they said "OK? OK?" i thought it was brillaint since you where the audience as well as characters and one character whas the acort was well as the audience. Brillaint. I liked that mucho mucho.

SO now, the question: When there is a play where actors change character like clothes. The convention is that there is no character and you are watching the actor change? ...right? I think it makes the play less of a "similar to reality" sort of play because you understand that ... AH! matame. ya me perdi. TOK. but you get the idea right? ..SO, if i change character infront of the audience ..does't that affect the "level of reality" in between the play and does the conection between the audience and the actor is lost since you are watching the actor change. I think it is like the masks huh? ?????